<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>That Danny! &#187; New Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thatdanny.com/category/new-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thatdanny.com</link>
	<description>News, Reviews,  Social Media and Net Moods</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:34:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blogging for Election – Top Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2010/02/23/blogging-for-election-%e2%80%93-top-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2010/02/23/blogging-for-election-%e2%80%93-top-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=1623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we set up blogminster.com, I spent quite a lot of my time trawling through MP websites and blogs. Of the hundreds of websites, some were good, some were bad and one stood out for (unwittingly) containing links to prescription drugs.
I thought it might be useful to share some insights as to how to campaign [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2010/02/23/blogging-for-election-%e2%80%93-top-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daily Star bombs The Sun newspaper (but is an in-joke really a good campaign strategy?)</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/11/24/daily-star-bombs-the-sun-newspaper-but-is-an-in-joke-really-a-good-campaign-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/11/24/daily-star-bombs-the-sun-newspaper-but-is-an-in-joke-really-a-good-campaign-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bingo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=1052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With bingo bringing in high revenue streams for online newspaper editions, it is little wonder that the Daily Star chose to hit The Sun where it hurts with its bingo advertising campaign - but bombing The Sun's Wapping HQ with Bingo balls? 
I'm sure the Sun's staff in Wapping will see the hilarity. After all, [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/11/24/daily-star-bombs-the-sun-newspaper-but-is-an-in-joke-really-a-good-campaign-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBay Libel Threat After Negative Feedback &#8211; When Online Libel Gets Personal</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/10/28/ebay-libel-threat-after-negative-feedback-when-online-libel-gets-personal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/10/28/ebay-libel-threat-after-negative-feedback-when-online-libel-gets-personal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Chris Read, a 42-year-old from Kent, is facing legal action for libel after leaving negative feedback for an item he bought on auction site eBay. On October 3, Read used the feedback facility on eBay and wrote: "Item was scratched, chipped and not the model advertised on Mr Jones's eBay account." Mr Read subsequently received [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.thatdanny.com/2009/10/25/guardian-jobs-site-hacked-%e2%80%93-personal-data-compromised-and-who-else-at-risk/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Guardian jobs site hacked – personal data compromised (and who else is at risk?)'>Guardian jobs site hacked – personal data compromised (and who else is at risk?)</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/10/28/ebay-libel-threat-after-negative-feedback-when-online-libel-gets-personal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Website Statistics &#8211; Five Pitfalls to Avoid</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/10/11/understanding-website-statistics-five-pitfalls-to-avoid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/10/11/understanding-website-statistics-five-pitfalls-to-avoid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Website statistics: what's wrong with the following statements?
1.	My website gets 20,000 hits a month!
2.	My website gets three million unique visitors a year!
3.	Our statistics show that users spend an average of 30 minutes per visit to our website!
When you boast to your friends that your blog gets 10,000 hits, or tell your boss that your company's [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/10/11/understanding-website-statistics-five-pitfalls-to-avoid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Design Companies with Rubbish Websites? Doh!</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/09/10/web-design-companies-with-rubbish-websites-doh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/09/10/web-design-companies-with-rubbish-websites-doh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The web design space is getting crowded, and it's getting difficult to tell the good guys from the ones who try to sell you a falafel of sales jargon. Or does it?
It never ceases to amaze me when a company, purporting to design websites, lets its own site look like it was cobbled together by [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/09/10/web-design-companies-with-rubbish-websites-doh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Sh*t &#8211; Google Chrome Doesn&#8217;t Really do THAT?!</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/09/05/oh-sht-google-chrome-doesnt-really-do-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/09/05/oh-sht-google-chrome-doesnt-really-do-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Your passwords and indiscretions for world+wife to see.
OK - I admit it's a problem that's also inherent in Firefox, but Google’s new browser, supposedly built from the ground up, should really NOT do this. It's absolutely effing bonkers!
What am I on about? Google Chrome allowing users to view ALL their saved passwords for different websites, [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/09/05/oh-sht-google-chrome-doesnt-really-do-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design Agency Wisdom &#8211; How to Fail a Client Pitch in Three Minutes!</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/08/07/design-agency-wisdom-how-to-fail-a-client-pitch-in-three-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/08/07/design-agency-wisdom-how-to-fail-a-client-pitch-in-three-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a call from a web design agency yesterday. The lady on the other end was cold calling the company I am consulting to, and somehow got through to me. 
Here is a summary of the interaction:
'I'm calling from agency X', she said, 'and I was wondering if you were planning any web design [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/08/07/design-agency-wisdom-how-to-fail-a-client-pitch-in-three-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IwantGreatCare.org &#8211; &#8220;rate your doctor&#8221; &#8211; will it go up in flames of libel?</title>
		<link>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/07/22/iwantgreatcareorg-rate-your-doctor-will-it-go-up-in-flames-of-libel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/07/22/iwantgreatcareorg-rate-your-doctor-will-it-go-up-in-flames-of-libel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thatdanny.com/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IwantGreatCare.org was launched in the UK as a service allowing patients to rate their doctors online. Patients can rate doctors out of 100 on "trust", "listening" and recommended categories, and then leave comments about the doctors that they have rated. 
Every time I consult to website owners about user generated content, one of the first [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thatdanny.com/2008/07/22/iwantgreatcareorg-rate-your-doctor-will-it-go-up-in-flames-of-libel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
